Up: Astronomy 9 Assignments
ASTRONOMY 9: HISTORY OF COSMOLOGY
Handout #21
J. E. Baker
UC Berkeley, Spring 2000
Life in the Quantum World
- The Nature of Light Revisited
- Recall the ``ultraviolet catastrophe'': classical physics
predicts blackbody spectrum keeps rising, infinite energies at
high frequencies!
- Max Planck (1900) makes a desperate hypothesis to
explain the observed spectra:
- Matter can only absorb and emit light in discrete
(quantized) amounts:
E = hf
- Light of frequency f comes in indivisible little packets of
energy hf
-
Joule sec is Planck's
constant
- Joule is an amount of energy (about enough to lift your
textbook a few cm)
- Small size of h means we don't usually see weird quantum
effects in everyday life
- Einstein (1905) studies photoelectric effect
- Awarded 1921 Nobel prize for this work (not relativity!)
- Shine light of frequency f on a metal
- No electrons are ejected for f<f0
- For f>f0, energy of ejected electrons is h(f-f0)
- Light is behaving like a particle (photon)
- But sometimes light behaves like a wave (eg, it diffracts
around corners)
wave/particle duality
- The Nature of Matter: A Brief History of Atomic Theory
- J. J. Thompson (
1900): ``plum pudding'' model
- Electrons are plums
- Diffuse positively charged pudding
- Ernest Rutherford (1911)
- Studies ``Rutherford scattering'' of charged particles
hitting thin metal sheets
- Almost all are just slightly deflected, but a few bounce
straight back
- Atomic nucleus is small and very dense, most of atom is
empty space!
- Electrons whiz around
- Niels Bohr (1913)
- Electron is accelerating as it moves around nucleus
- Maxwell's equations say it should radiate all its energy
and collapse to the nucleus!
- Bohr's solution: electron can only exist in
discrete atomic levels--atoms are quantized too!
- Light is emitted or absorbed when electron jumps between
levels (a ``quantum leap'': it doesn't go in between)
- Each atom has a different set of levels, explains
spectral lines
- Louis de Broglie (1924)
- Just as light can behave like particles, electrons can
behave like waves!
- Electron can exist only in orbits where integer number of
waves ``fit'' around the orbit
- Explains Bohr's quantization idea
- The Uncertainty Principle
- Werner Heisenberg (1925)
- If precisely measure momentum (p) of a particle, its
position (x) becomes completely uncertain, and vice versa!
where
and
means ``uncertainty in''
- Can also be expressed as relationship between measurements of
energy and time:
- Destroys old Laplacian philosophy of determinism!
- Observer also plays a crucial role: what you choose to measure
influences the physical state of the system!
- Max Born and Erwin Schrödinger (1927)
- Quantum mechanics (QM) only describes probabilities
- The wavefunction
specifies all there is to
know about a system
- Schrodinger equation determines evolution of wavefunction in
time and space
- The wavefunction of an electron at point x represents
the probability of finding it at x:
- Particles are ``fuzzy''!
- Quantum Statistics
- Particles have an intrinsic ``spin'', also quantized: only
comes in units of
- Particles aren't really little spheres, spin is not really
like our common-sense notion
- Two types of particles, classified according to spin:
- Fermions: Spins are a half-integer multiple (1/2,
3/2, 5/2, ...) of
- Named after Enrico Fermi (nuclear physicist)
- Examples: electron, proton, neutron (normal matter)
- ``Anti-social'' particles: obey Pauli's Exclusion Principle
- No two fermions may be in the same quantum state
- Bosons: Spins are an integer multiple (0, 1, 2, ...)
of
- Named after Satyendranath Bose (Indian physicist)
- Examples: photon (spin-0), graviton (spin-2, carries
gravitational force just like photon carries electromagnetism)
- Gregarious, ``social'' particles: all like to enter the same
quantum state!
- Note: spin-2 in a sense means you have to rotate by
before you look the same! Spin-1/2 means
you only have to rotate by 
- Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum mechanics works very well, in that it is a
great tool for calculating things
- Problems only arise when you try to interpret it in
terms of our everyday experience
- Very disturbing to many founders of quantum physics
- Recent research is beginning to explore boundary between
quantum and classical realms: how does quantum weirdness give way
to macroscopic classical normality?
- 1.
- Copenhagen (``standard'') interpretation (Bohr and others,
1920s)
- Act of observation mysteriously ``collapses the
wavefunction''
- When you're not looking at it, the electron spreads out all
over space, and different outcomes are superposed on top of each
other
- The act of observation somehow localizes things, or selects
a particular outcome
- Einstein objects: do you really think the Moon isn't there
when you're not looking at it?
- Example: Schrodinger's cat
- Feline in a box with vial of poison, decay of a
radioactive atom triggers release of poison
- QM says the atom enters a ``superposition of states'',
both decayed and non-decayed, until an observation is made
- But then is the cat also simultaneously dead and not-dead?
Implies macroscopic manifestation of quantum weirdness
- What exactly is the act of ``observation''? Does human
consciousness play a special physical role? Or do common
environmental interactions collapse the wavefunction and
prevent the cat from entering superposition?
- 2.
- Many-worlds interpretation (Hugh Everett, 1957)
- All possibilities embodied by the wavefunction
actually occur!
- Universe constantly forks into a multitude of different
versions of itself (``parallel universes'')
- In one universe, Schrodinger's cat is alive; in another it
is dead
- Universes are cut off from each other
- 3.
- ``Hidden variables'' (historically favored by Einstein and
others)
- Idea: QM is a terribly incomplete theory, does not preserve
locality
- Example: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) ``paradox''
- Send two particles off in a quantum superposition (eg,
spins of each are pointing both up and down at the same time!)
- Measurement of one particle causes it to choose one state
or the other
- Has instantaneous effect on the other particle, even if it
has traveled half-way across the universe! Spooky
- Note: doesn't violate special relativity, since still
can't send a signal faster than light
- Some unknown underlying ``variables'' affect the system,
allow only local effects
- Experimental evidence does not support this interpretation
This document was generated using the
LaTeX2HTML translator Version 98.1p1 release (March 2nd, 1998)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -up_url ../../assign.html -up_title Astronomy 9 Assignments -split 0 -t Astronomy 9 (Spring 2000): Homework 15: Solutions -dir /coma8/jbaker/public_html/courses/ay9/week11/handout21 handout21.tex.
The translation was initiated by jonathan baker on 2000-04-05
Up: Astronomy 9 Assignments
jonathan baker
2000-04-05